|
|
Pirate Parts
After
Norton stopped production of the Commando, there were periods when
original spare parts were in short supply. A very profitable business
opportunity for "pirate" manufacturers developed, and
unfortunately such "pirate" manufacturers still exist, Mostly
originating from India, Pakistan, and China. Some parts are just annoying
in that they don't fit, or are of inferior quality. Some parts, however,
are simply dangerous.
We
have examined and monitored most of the pirate parts over time and these
are some of the examples we have found in the marketplace available from
other suppliers-
|

|
Let
us start with a potentially very dangerous and costly item, the
big end bolt (Part# 06-6486).
In our
picture you find two bolts; the top one is Andover Norton, the
bottom one is sold to the trade at the same figure we currently
pay for just the forging of each bolt, i.e. before it is hardened,
the thread rolled, ground to size etc… By the time our bolt is
finished and sold to the dealer, it costs far more than the pirate
bolt- hence the motivation for the dealer to sell the pirate part,
purchased cheaply and sold with a very hefty profit.
Our bolt is not just dimensionally different to the pirate part
below it, as a forging it is far stronger than the pirate bolt
that is turned from solid bar. Our threads are rolled, and as
every engineer knows, a rolled thread is far more resistant to
tensile loads than a cut thread.
If and when the pirate bolt gives up- and we hear this has
happened on numerous occasions, the damage is normally devastating
and will at best cost a conrod, piston, and valve(s), at worst the
crankcase and more.
The
pirate bolts are easy to identify by the following points:
Their
length- ours are 62.6mm, “pirate” are 63.3 mm long.
At
the end of the threaded section on the “pirate” there is a
section of uncut thread.
The
“pirate” main ground diameter length is 15mm long.
To
re-iterate- these “pirate” bolts do not have the tensile
strength required for this application and should not be
used. |
|
From big end bolts to
conrods.
We are convinced- and our own
experience with very reliable racing engines with a lot more power
and torque than any standart production engines proves it- that
our standard production Genuine Norton Factory Parts
conrods (right) will stand all stresses
they are likely to encounter in a Commando engine.
Other offerings are in the
market. Steel conrods, heavy and asking for considerable
re-balancing iof the crank and therefore the answer to no
question, and aluminium conrods machined from billet.
The billet conrods look
"nicer" than ours, and look more substantial, too. This
they are- in weight, 10grams to be exact- but not in strength. Furthermore,
they have a lot more weight near the small end, where one does not
want it. Original conrods are far lighter in this crucial area.
Our original conrods are made
from forgings. A forging is far stronger than a piece of alumunium
that is then machined to shape. As with the big end bolts above,
whilst a part turned from billet may LOOK nicer, it is in
fact far less equipped to take stresses than a forged part. It can
only take the same stresses as a forged part if far more material is being used to
make it and it is then substantially bigger and heavier than the
forged part.
If no forged conrods were
available to rebuild a Norton engine I might be tempted to use the
billet one on the left and take it easy on the engine to
compensate. However, as our forged rods are available, and
have withstood up to 8.500rpm in a friend's racing Commando
repeatedly, so are more than up to the job in any given Commando
application, I use nothing else for road and race engines.
The rod failures I have seen
in the last thirty years always had a basic technical reason-
engine ran out of oil, rod was mechanically damaged when
installed, wrong con rod bolts or re-used big end nuts and bolts.
With an original conrod I have yet to see a failure caused by
weakness of the rod itself.
I therefore use Genuine
conrods in all my own Commando engines, road and race, and
recommend to do as I do.
|
|
|
Not
potentially costly, but wasted money nonetheless- Dominator/early
Commando headlamp brackets.
(Indian “pirate” part on the left)
These
beauties (grey/brown primer paint) are Made in India, and it is
likely that less scrupulous e-bay vendors sell them as
"genuine". At first glance the poor welding of the
headlamp holding "ear" is obvious, as is the round hole
with the washer welded behind it where the original has an oval to
allow for directional adjustment of the headlamp. Less obvious at
first glance is the fact that they do not fit! The headlamp
bracket should have a portion with a reduced diameter at the
bottom that locates the bracket in the upper fork shroud. These
Indian brackets cannot be located correctly at best, at worst
can't be fitted at all.
|
|
|
|
Another
potential failure- swinging arm mounting parts.
These
“pirate” bushes (left) are turned from bronze bar, not sintered
as they should be (right) in order to absorb the oil they are
lubricated with. The machined bronze stock bar cannot absorb oil
and will wear very quickly, resulting in play in the swing arm and
erratic roadholding. Apart from the material another giveaway is
the internal chamfer which is not concentric with the bore. This
chamfer was obviously made by hand rather than as part of the
machining process.
We
did not go to the length of having the steel of the axle analysed,
It is easy enough to recognise in that the centre screw that
secures the axle in the subframe is not the correct UNF thread but
a metric thread. Another clue is the general poor standard of
manufacture, as can be seen on the ends of the axle (genuine axle
left resp. top).
All
genuine swinging arm spindles have a central thread for the
locating screw as well as two cotter pin slots and are also hard
chrome-plated. |
|
Another problem
area is the gearchange lever, that is sold for AMC gearboxes and
stated to be suitable for Commandos. Not only are the pattern
levers too long, but
the splines are the wrong pitch and not properly formed, as you
will notice when you try to push it onto the gear change shaft.
The Andover Norton lever (bottom resp. right) can be pushed on by hand, the Indian
counterpart needs a hammer.
And has a metric M6 pinch bolt through it!
|
|
|
|
Air Filter Element- 850
Mk1A, Mk2A, Mk3
Another
prevalent pirate part is the disintegrating air filter; a difficult
one to identify straight away. What happens is that the cheap foam
is drawn into the engine, with two big problems resulting from this-
the damage caused by the melted foam depositing inside the engine
and carburettor, and the lack of any air filtration after a very
short time with the associated consequences!
The
way to identify these is from the structure of the wire mesh inside.
It can be seen in the photograph that our sample pirate filter
(left) shed its foam within months lying on a shelf unused
, this problem will be accelerated dramatically when the filter is
exposed to petrol vapour when in use. Genuine Filters (right)
have a wider wire mesh inside which can be felt though the foam.
|
|
The "Peashooter"
Norton silencer.
Not
a critical item one might think, and there are plenty of offerings
in the market. However, it is crucial to engine performance to get
the proper item. Andover Norton sells four different versions- the
seamless one in the picture, one with seams as on the 850s, one with
"Norton" logo and seams, and a special one with 1
1/2" (38mm) inlet for specials and Triumphs. All of them are
identical internally.
The
crucial feature are the internals. They must be absorption
dampers-. many cheap ones are labyrinth ones that you can't see
through- and, also very important, not only for sound but for
performance, it must have "flutes" in the internal through
tube, not a tube with holes. Anything but the original style
internals will decrease performance, even the production racers had
the same internals.
|
|
|
Front mudguards
Not necessarily a safety or
performance related item, but one that is the finishing touch to the
motorcycle. We have recently seen stainless front mudguards Made in
India. The colour of the stainless is different to ours, the radius
is slightly off, but a very significant feature is the front lip,
which in our case requires a costly press tool that the imitation
never had the benefit of, so looks amateurish in comparison.
We have since heard they tend
to crack, probably because the hand-formed lip is not as free of
local stresses as our pressing, or because the steel of the mudguard
is different.
Indian mudguard right, genuine
part left.
|
|